BEMER 3000 is Different to Conventional Magnetic Field Applications

When conventional magnetic field application devices are compared with the BEMER System, the special impulse form of the BEMER signal immediately stands out. What influence does this special form have in terms of the efficacy of the BEMER signal? The scientific background to the BEMER signal is extremely complex and is explained here in detail. Brought down to a level that can be generally understood, the unique efficacy can be explained by means of the following visual comparison:

Watering can for the natural self-regulating mechanisms

In much the same way that a watering can with spray head waters a flower bed "broadband", so the BEMER signal can also ensure broad activation of molecular and cellular processes in the body. Because, when compared with conventional systems, it has a significantly broader frequency spectrum.

The frequency spectrums of conventional sinus or sawtooth impulses means they can only activate a much narrower band of processes. In the watering can comparison, the watering can would only have one hole in the spray head. Watering effectively with it would not be possible.

Some conventional systems attempt to compensate for the restriction of the narrower band breadth by adapting their impulse to the physical response (e.g. heart variability) of the user. However, this approach does not come close to the unique effectiveness of the BEMER signal for two reasons:

• Shifting an impulse frequency basically alters nothing as regards its narrow band range compared with the BEMER signal. Transposed to the watering can comparison, the hole of the "single-hole watering can" is simply relocated without changing anything in terms of the watering method. The flower bed is not watered more effectively as a result.
• It is technically possible, to alter the frequency and intensity of an impulse based on the body's responses. However, since we cannot directly establish what effect modifying the signal has on individual processes (and this is the crux of the matter), there is simply conjecture about the effectiveness of the individual adjustment. Transposed to the watering can comparison, an attempt is made to water the flower bed using the "single-hole watering can" but with the person doing the watering wearing a blindfold. By listening to the splashing sounds, we are able to tell whether we happen to be watering tulips or primroses and adjust the watering accordingly.

In the visual comparison it becomes clear that the watering can principle is the most effective method for achieving broadband activation of the body's natural self-regulating mechanisms. On account of the particularly broad frequency spectrum also a wider range of processes is activated as a result. It is precisely this effect that makes the BREMER signal so successful.